Skip to main content

Competition and monopoly

Value creation vs capture

Airlines: huge X, tiny Y (≈0 cumulative US profits over a century). Google search: smaller revenue than airlines historically, far more valuable. Perfect competition is easy to model and praised politically — miserable if you are in it.

Binary frame (useful exaggeration): perfect competition vs monopoly. Little in between. Everyone lies: monopolists claim fierce competition (regulation); non-monopolists claim unique niches (fundraising).

Market storytelling lies

ActorLie
Non-monopoly“We’re the only British restaurant in Palo Alto” (fake intersection)
Monopoly“We’re in advertising / tech broadly” (fake huge union)

Startups with buzzword intersections (“sharing mobile social”) often describe the nothing of nowhere.

How to build monopoly

  1. Start small — Amazon books → commerce; eBay Pez → auctions; PayPal eBay power sellers; Facebook Harvard. Business schools undervalue tiny starts.
  2. Avoid giant markets day one — cleantech “trillion-dollar energy” decks meant minnows in oceans of competitors.
  3. Characteristics: proprietary tech (~10× better), network effects, economies of scale, brand (invest carefully).
  4. Software: near-zero marginal cost → fast scale with the market.

Last mover

Most DCF value is decades out. Growth is measurable; durability is undervalued. Ask why you are still the leader in 10–20 years. Capablanca: study the endgame.

History lesson

Science and many tech waves: Y ≈ 0% for inventors. Railroads, Wright brothers, textile mills — value competed away. Rare captures: vertically integrated complex monopolies (Ford, Standard Oil; Tesla/SpaceX integration) and software network businesses.

Psychology

Humans are mimetic (ape = primate and imitate). Competition as validation is often insanity (20k actors / year → ~20 make it). Kissinger on academia: ferocious battles, tiny stakes. Prefer the vast gate nobody is rushing.

Lean startup / endless iteration: Thiel is skeptical — great companies often make a quantum leap, not survey-driven sameness. Risk of a meaningless life can exceed “safe” career risk.

Discussion

Comments

Share feedback or questions about this page. No account required.

Loading comments…