Competition and monopoly
Value creation vs capture
Airlines: huge X, tiny Y (≈0 cumulative US profits over a century). Google search: smaller revenue than airlines historically, far more valuable. Perfect competition is easy to model and praised politically — miserable if you are in it.
Binary frame (useful exaggeration): perfect competition vs monopoly. Little in between. Everyone lies: monopolists claim fierce competition (regulation); non-monopolists claim unique niches (fundraising).
Market storytelling lies
| Actor | Lie |
|---|---|
| Non-monopoly | “We’re the only British restaurant in Palo Alto” (fake intersection) |
| Monopoly | “We’re in advertising / tech broadly” (fake huge union) |
Startups with buzzword intersections (“sharing mobile social”) often describe the nothing of nowhere.
How to build monopoly
- Start small — Amazon books → commerce; eBay Pez → auctions; PayPal eBay power sellers; Facebook Harvard. Business schools undervalue tiny starts.
- Avoid giant markets day one — cleantech “trillion-dollar energy” decks meant minnows in oceans of competitors.
- Characteristics: proprietary tech (~10× better), network effects, economies of scale, brand (invest carefully).
- Software: near-zero marginal cost → fast scale with the market.
Last mover
Most DCF value is decades out. Growth is measurable; durability is undervalued. Ask why you are still the leader in 10–20 years. Capablanca: study the endgame.
History lesson
Science and many tech waves: Y ≈ 0% for inventors. Railroads, Wright brothers, textile mills — value competed away. Rare captures: vertically integrated complex monopolies (Ford, Standard Oil; Tesla/SpaceX integration) and software network businesses.
Psychology
Humans are mimetic (ape = primate and imitate). Competition as validation is often insanity (20k actors / year → ~20 make it). Kissinger on academia: ferocious battles, tiny stakes. Prefer the vast gate nobody is rushing.
Lean startup / endless iteration: Thiel is skeptical — great companies often make a quantum leap, not survey-driven sameness. Risk of a meaningless life can exceed “safe” career risk.
Discussion
Comments
Share feedback or questions about this page. No account required.
Loading comments…