Skip to main content

VALUE quality gate

Executive view

Reject artefacts that fail any VALUE letter—especially Understandable and Executable—regardless of how polished the deck looks.

Decision required: Does this artefact pass VALUE and Trust, or must it be improved first?

Technical view

Label claims as Fact, Assumption, Hypothesis or Unknown; do not invent unknowns.

A clear plan can still fail Trust if it ignores residency, oversight or auditability.

Apply VALUE to every artefact before you advance an 8D stage or send material to an executive.

The five checks

LetterMeaningQuestion
VValuableIs there a material business need?
AActionableIs it specific enough to execute?
LLogicalIs it structured and evidence-backed?
UUnderstandableCan the audience grasp it without unnecessary effort?
EExecutableAre ownership, constraints, risks, and next steps clear?

If any letter fails, improve the artefact—do not advance the gate.

Trust score (separate)

VALUE is about communication quality and executability. Trust is scored on its own axis:

  • Privacy
  • Security
  • Fairness
  • Transparency
  • Human oversight
  • Auditability
  • Reliability

An artefact can pass VALUE and still fail trust (for example, a clear plan that ignores data residency).

Evidence labels

On discovery and diagnosis surfaces, label claims:

LabelUse when
FactVerified with a source
AssumptionNeeded for progress; must be tested
HypothesisProposed cause or solution under evaluation
UnknownExplicit gap—do not invent

Practice

  1. Pick one recent slide or memo from an AI initiative.
  2. Score each VALUE letter pass/fail in one sentence.
  3. Rewrite the bottom line so U and E pass before you touch tooling.

VALUE gate checklist

  • V — material business need stated
  • A — specific enough to execute
  • L — structured and evidence-backed
  • U — audience can grasp without unnecessary effort
  • E — ownership, constraints, risks and next steps clear
  • Trust scored separately (privacy, security, fairness, transparency, oversight, auditability, reliability)

Discussion

Comments

Share feedback or questions about this page. No account required.

Loading comments…